orchestrate-review
تایید شدهUse when user asks to "deep review the code", "thorough code review", "multi-pass review", or when orchestrating Phase 9 review loop. Provides review pass definitions (code quality, security, performance, test coverage, specialists), signal detection patterns, and iteration algorithms.
(1)
۳۷۵ستاره
۱دانلود
۳۸بازدید
نصب مهارت
مهارتها کدهای شخص ثالث از مخازن عمومی GitHub هستند. SkillHub الگوهای مخرب شناختهشده را اسکن میکند اما نمیتواند امنیت را تضمین کند. قبل از نصب، کد منبع را بررسی کنید.
نصب سراسری (سطح کاربر):
npx skillhub install avifenesh/awesome-slash/orchestrate-reviewنصب در پروژه فعلی:
npx skillhub install avifenesh/awesome-slash/orchestrate-review --projectمسیر پیشنهادی: ~/.claude/skills/orchestrate-review/
محتوای SKILL.md
---
name: orchestrate-review
description: "Use when user asks to \"deep review the code\", \"thorough code review\", \"multi-pass review\", or when orchestrating Phase 9 review loop. Provides review pass definitions (code quality, security, performance, test coverage, specialists), signal detection patterns, and iteration algorithms."
metadata:
short-description: "Multi-pass code review orchestration"
---
# Orchestrate Review
Multi-pass code review with parallel Task agents, finding aggregation, and iteration until clean.
## Scope-Based Specialist Selection
Select conditional specialists based on the review scope:
- **User request**: Detect signals from content user refers to (files, directory, module)
- **Workflow (Phase 9)**: Detect signals from changed files only
- **Project audit**: Detect signals from project structure as a whole
## Review Passes
Spawn parallel `general-purpose` Task agents (model: `sonnet`), one per pass:
### Core (Always)
```javascript
const corePasses = [
{ id: 'code-quality', role: 'code quality reviewer',
focus: ['Style and consistency', 'Best practices', 'Bugs and logic errors', 'Error handling', 'Maintainability', 'Duplication'] },
{ id: 'security', role: 'security reviewer',
focus: ['Auth/authz flaws', 'Input validation', 'Injection risks', 'Secrets exposure', 'Insecure defaults'] },
{ id: 'performance', role: 'performance reviewer',
focus: ['N+1 queries', 'Blocking operations', 'Hot path inefficiencies', 'Memory leaks'] },
{ id: 'test-coverage', role: 'test coverage reviewer',
focus: ['Missing tests', 'Edge case coverage', 'Test quality', 'Integration needs', 'Mock appropriateness'] }
];
```
### Conditional (Signal-Based)
```javascript
if (signals.hasDb) passes.push({ id: 'database', role: 'database specialist',
focus: ['Query performance', 'Indexes/transactions', 'Migration safety', 'Data integrity'] });
if (signals.needsArchitecture) passes.push({ id: 'architecture', role: 'architecture reviewer',
focus: ['Module boundaries', 'Dependency direction', 'Cross-layer coupling', 'Pattern consistency'] });
if (signals.hasApi) passes.push({ id: 'api', role: 'api designer',
focus: ['REST conventions', 'Error/status consistency', 'Pagination/filters', 'Versioning'] });
if (signals.hasFrontend) passes.push({ id: 'frontend', role: 'frontend specialist',
focus: ['Component boundaries', 'State management', 'Accessibility', 'Render performance'] });
if (signals.hasBackend) passes.push({ id: 'backend', role: 'backend specialist',
focus: ['Service boundaries', 'Domain logic', 'Concurrency/idempotency', 'Background job safety'] });
if (signals.hasDevops) passes.push({ id: 'devops', role: 'devops reviewer',
focus: ['CI/CD safety', 'Secrets handling', 'Build/test pipelines', 'Deploy config'] });
```
## Signal Detection
```javascript
const signals = {
hasDb: files.some(f => /(db|migrations?|schema|prisma|typeorm|sql)/i.test(f)),
hasApi: files.some(f => /(api|routes?|controllers?|handlers?)/i.test(f)),
hasFrontend: files.some(f => /\.(tsx|jsx|vue|svelte)$/.test(f)),
hasBackend: files.some(f => /(server|backend|services?|domain)/i.test(f)),
hasDevops: files.some(f => /(\.github\/workflows|Dockerfile|k8s|terraform)/i.test(f)),
needsArchitecture: files.length > 20 // 20+ files typically indicates cross-module changes
};
```
## Task Prompt Template
```
You are a ${pass.role}. Review these changed files:
${files.join('\n')}
Focus: ${pass.focus.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n')}
Return JSON:
{
"pass": "${pass.id}",
"findings": [{
"file": "path.ts",
"line": 42,
"severity": "critical|high|medium|low",
"description": "Issue",
"suggestion": "Fix",
"confidence": "high|medium|low",
"falsePositive": false
}]
}
Example findings (diverse passes and severities):
// Security - high severity
{ "file": "src/auth/login.ts", "line": 89, "severity": "high",
"description": "Password comparison uses timing-vulnerable string equality",
"suggestion": "Use crypto.timingSafeEqual() instead of ===",
"confidence": "high", "falsePositive": false }
// Code quality - medium severity
{ "file": "src/utils/helpers.ts", "line": 45, "severity": "medium",
"description": "Duplicated validation logic exists in src/api/validators.ts:23",
"suggestion": "Extract to shared lib/validation.ts",
"confidence": "high", "falsePositive": false }
// Performance - low severity
{ "file": "src/config.ts", "line": 12, "severity": "low",
"description": "Magic number 3600 should be named constant",
"suggestion": "const CACHE_TTL_SECONDS = 3600;",
"confidence": "medium", "falsePositive": false }
// False positive example
{ "file": "src/crypto/hash.ts", "line": 78, "severity": "high",
"description": "Non-constant time comparison",
"suggestion": "N/A - intentional for non-secret data",
"confidence": "low", "falsePositive": true }
Report all issues with confidence >= medium. Empty findings array if clean.
```
## Aggregation
```javascript
function aggregateFindings(results) {
const items = [];
for (const {pass, findings = []} of results) {
for (const f of findings) {
items.push({
id: `${pass}:${f.file}:${f.line}:${f.description}`,
pass, ...f,
status: f.falsePositive ? 'false-positive' : 'open'
});
}
}
// Deduplicate by id
const deduped = [...new Map(items.map(i => [i.id, i])).values()];
// Group by severity
const bySeverity = {critical: [], high: [], medium: [], low: []};
deduped.forEach(i => !i.falsePositive && bySeverity[i.severity || 'low'].push(i));
const totals = Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(bySeverity).map(([k, v]) => [k, v.length]));
return {
items: deduped,
bySeverity,
totals,
openCount: Object.values(totals).reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0)
};
}
```
## Iteration Loop
**Security Note**: Fixes are applied by the orchestrator using standard Edit tool permissions. Critical/high severity findings should be reviewed before applying - do not blindly apply LLM-suggested fixes to security-sensitive code. The orchestrator validates each fix against the original issue.
```javascript
// 5 iterations balances thoroughness vs cost; 2 stalls indicates fixes aren't progressing
const MAX_ITERATIONS = 5, MAX_STALLS = 2;
let iteration = 1, stallCount = 0, lastHash = null;
while (iteration <= MAX_ITERATIONS) {
// 1. Spawn parallel Task agents
const results = await Promise.all(passes.map(pass => Task({
subagent_type: 'general-purpose',
model: 'sonnet',
prompt: /* see template above */
})));
// 2. Aggregate findings
const findings = aggregateFindings(results);
// 3. Check if done
if (findings.openCount === 0) {
workflowState.updateFlow({ reviewResult: { approved: true, iterations: iteration } });
break;
}
// 4. Fix issues (severity order: critical → high → medium → low)
// Orchestrator reviews each suggestion before applying via Edit tool
for (const issue of [...findings.bySeverity.critical, ...findings.bySeverity.high,
...findings.bySeverity.medium, ...findings.bySeverity.low]) {
if (!issue.falsePositive) {
// Read file, locate issue.line, validate suggestion, apply via Edit tool
// For complex fixes, use simple-fixer agent pattern
}
}
// 5. Commit
exec(`git add . && git commit -m "fix: review feedback (iteration ${iteration})"`);
// 6. Post-iteration deslop
Task({ subagent_type: 'deslop:deslop-agent', model: 'sonnet' });
// 7. Stall detection
const hash = crypto.createHash('sha256')
.update(JSON.stringify(findings.items.filter(i => !i.falsePositive)))
.digest('hex');
stallCount = hash === lastHash ? stallCount + 1 : 0;
lastHash = hash;
// 8. Check limits
if (stallCount >= MAX_STALLS || iteration >= MAX_ITERATIONS) {
workflowState.updateFlow({
reviewResult: { approved: false, blocked: true,
reason: stallCount >= MAX_STALLS ? 'stall-detected' : 'iteration-limit',
remaining: findings.totals }
});
break;
}
iteration++;
}
```
## Review Queue
Store state at `{stateDir}/review-queue-{timestamp}.json`:
```json
{
"status": "open|resolved|blocked",
"scope": { "type": "diff", "files": ["..."] },
"passes": ["code-quality", "security"],
"items": [],
"iteration": 0,
"stallCount": 0
}
```
Delete when approved. Keep when blocked for orchestrator inspection.
## Cross-Platform Compatibility
This skill uses `Task({ subagent_type: ... })` which is Claude Code syntax. For other platforms:
| Platform | Equivalent Syntax |
|----------|-------------------|
| Claude Code | `Task({ subagent_type: 'general-purpose', model: 'sonnet', prompt: ... })` |
| OpenCode | `spawn_agent({ type: 'general-purpose', model: 'sonnet', prompt: ... })` |
| Codex CLI | `$agent general-purpose --model sonnet --prompt "..."` |
The aggregation and iteration logic remains the same across platforms - only the agent spawning syntax differs.