paper-to-intuition
تایید شدهTransforms an academic paper into deep, multi-layered understanding. Use when asked to explain a paper, break down a research paper, understand an arXiv paper, or build intuition for a technical concept from a paper. Generates explanations at multiple levels plus visual intuition diagrams.
(0)
۵۴
۵
۸
نصب مهارت
مهارتها کدهای شخص ثالث از مخازن عمومی GitHub هستند. SkillHub الگوهای مخرب شناختهشده را اسکن میکند اما نمیتواند امنیت را تضمین کند. قبل از نصب، کد منبع را بررسی کنید.
نصب سراسری (سطح کاربر):
npx skillhub install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/paper-to-intuitionنصب در پروژه فعلی:
npx skillhub install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/paper-to-intuition --projectمسیر پیشنهادی: ~/.claude/skills/paper-to-intuition/
محتوای SKILL.md
---
name: paper-to-intuition
description: Transforms an academic paper into deep, multi-layered understanding. Use when asked to explain a paper, break down a research paper, understand an arXiv paper, or build intuition for a technical concept from a paper. Generates explanations at multiple levels plus visual intuition diagrams.
---
# Paper to Intuition
Transform dense academic papers into genuine understanding through layered explanation and visual intuition.
## Process
1. **Get the paper** - Ask for the arXiv link, PDF, or paper title
2. **Extract the core** - Identify the single key insight (one sentence)
3. **Build the ladder** - Create explanations at 4 levels
4. **Visualize intuition** - Generate interactive diagrams
5. **Stress test understanding** - "What breaks if we remove X?"
## The Explanation Ladder
Generate explanations at each level, with each building on the last:
### Level 1: ELI5 (1 paragraph)
- No jargon, no equations
- Use familiar analogies from everyday life
- A curious 10-year-old should roughly get it
### Level 2: Undergraduate (2-3 paragraphs)
- Assume calculus, basic linear algebra, intro ML
- Introduce key terms with definitions
- Connect to textbook concepts they'd know
### Level 3: Graduate (3-4 paragraphs)
- Assume ML fundamentals, optimization, probability
- Discuss relationship to prior work
- Explain why naive approaches don't work
- Cover the key equations with plain-English annotations
### Level 4: Researcher (2-3 paragraphs)
- Assume field expertise
- Subtle technical contributions
- Limitations and open questions
- How this changes what's possible
## Key Equations Breakdown
For each important equation:
```
[Equation in LaTeX]
In words: [Plain English translation]
Each term:
- [symbol]: [what it represents] [why it's there]
Intuition: [Why this mathematical form? What would change if we used a different form?]
```
## Visual Intuition Artifact
Generate a self-contained HTML file with:
- **Architecture diagram** - Boxes and arrows showing information flow
- **Interactive sliders** - Manipulate key parameters, see effects
- **Before/after comparisons** - What the method improves over baselines
- **Failure case visualization** - When and why it breaks down
Use SVG for diagrams, vanilla JavaScript for interactivity. Dark theme, clean typography.
```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>[Paper Name] - Visual Intuition</title>
<style>
:root { --bg: #1a1a2e; --text: #eee; --accent: #4f8cff; }
/* Clean, research-aesthetic styling */
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>[Paper Title]</h1>
<p class="tldr">[One-sentence insight]</p>
<section id="architecture">
<svg><!-- Information flow diagram --></svg>
</section>
<section id="interactive">
<!-- Parameter sliders with live updates -->
</section>
<section id="comparisons">
<!-- Before/after, ablations -->
</section>
</body>
</html>
```
## The "What Breaks?" Analysis
For each major component, explain:
1. **What it does** - The role this component plays
2. **What breaks without it** - Concrete failure mode
3. **Why this solution** - Alternatives considered, why this won
4. **The tradeoff** - What we pay for this choice (compute, complexity, assumptions)
## Output Structure
Deliver as a structured document:
```markdown
# [Paper Title]
**TL;DR:** [One sentence]
**Why it matters:** [One paragraph on significance]
## The Explanation Ladder
### ELI5
[...]
### Undergraduate Level
[...]
### Graduate Level
[...]
### Researcher Level
[...]
## Key Equations
### Equation 1: [Name]
[Breakdown as specified above]
## What Breaks If We Remove...
### [Component 1]
[Analysis]
### [Component 2]
[Analysis]
## Visual Intuition
[Link to or embed HTML artifact]
## Further Reading
- [Prerequisite paper 1]
- [Follow-up work 1]
```
## Quality Standards
- Every analogy must be accurate, not just catchy
- Equations must be explained, not just translated
- Visuals must reveal structure, not just decorate
- The researcher-level section should contain insight, not just summary
- Admit when something is genuinely confusing or poorly explained in the original paper