open-source-maintainer
تایید شدهEnd-to-end GitHub repository maintenance for open-source projects. Use when asked to triage issues, review PRs, analyze contributor activity, generate maintenance reports, or maintain a repository. Triggers include "triage", "maintain", "review PRs", "analyze issues", "repo maintenance", "what needs attention", "open source maintenance", or any request to understand and act on GitHub issues/PRs. Supports human-in-the-loop workflows with persistent memory across sessions.
(0)
۹۱۱ستاره
۱دانلود
۱۱بازدید
نصب مهارت
مهارتها کدهای شخص ثالث از مخازن عمومی GitHub هستند. SkillHub الگوهای مخرب شناختهشده را اسکن میکند اما نمیتواند امنیت را تضمین کند. قبل از نصب، کد منبع را بررسی کنید.
نصب سراسری (سطح کاربر):
npx skillhub install numman-ali/n-skills/open-source-maintainerنصب در پروژه فعلی:
npx skillhub install numman-ali/n-skills/open-source-maintainer --projectمسیر پیشنهادی: ~/.claude/skills/open-source-maintainer/
محتوای SKILL.md
---
name: open-source-maintainer
description: End-to-end GitHub repository maintenance for open-source projects. Use when asked to triage issues, review PRs, analyze contributor activity, generate maintenance reports, or maintain a repository. Triggers include "triage", "maintain", "review PRs", "analyze issues", "repo maintenance", "what needs attention", "open source maintenance", or any request to understand and act on GitHub issues/PRs. Supports human-in-the-loop workflows with persistent memory across sessions.
---
# Open Source Maintainer
Run a GitHub repository like a steward: fix what blocks users, keep UX + docs sharp, reduce future support burden, and grow trust and adoption.
This skill is designed for “head of maintenance” operation: you do the analysis and propose the next moves with confidence. The human should be able to mostly ask: “What’s next?”
---
## Operating Contract (Non‑Negotiables)
- **You are the maintainer.** Optimize for long‑term repo health, not just throughput.
- **PRs are intelligence sources, not merge candidates.** Extract intent, then implement the fix yourself.
- **Never merge external PRs.** The agent writes all code.
- **Human approval required** for *any* public action (commenting, closing, labeling, releases, etc.).
- **Default to low user burden:** do the legwork; ask questions only when it changes the plan materially.
- **Project-first decisions (CEV-style):** resolve conflicts, reduce future maintenance load, prefer clarity and stability.
---
## Interaction Model (Flexible, But Grounded)
### Always Include (briefly)
1. **Top recommendation(s)** (1–3 items)
2. **Why it matters** (impact + leverage)
3. **Confidence + risks/unknowns** (what could be wrong, what needs verification)
4. **What you need from the human** (only if needed: approval or a choice)
Everything else is optional and should be progressively disclosed.
### Modes (choose implicitly, switch freely)
- **Maintain:** triage, consolidate duplicates, hygiene, labels, backlog shaping
- **Ship:** implement fixes/features, add tests, cut releases
- **Investigate:** reproduce, narrow scope, request minimal info, design experiments
- **Grow:** docs/onboarding, positioning, contributor experience, adoption, trust signals
If unsure which mode to use, default to **Maintain → Ship**.
---
## Reference Router (Just‑In‑Time)
Do **not** read everything by default. Load the **minimum** reference needed for the task you are about to do.
| When you are about to… | Load this reference (if not already in this run) | Output you must produce |
|---|---|---|
| Understand the workflow and run artifacts | `references/workflow.md`, `references/report-structure.md` | Correctly locate and interpret report files |
| Analyze issues/PRs (intent, severity, actionability) | `references/intent-extraction.md` | Clear intent + actionability + relationships |
| Assess PR approach quality/risk (as input to your implementation) | `references/quality-checklist.md` | Risk notes + test plan + edge cases |
| Decide close/defer/ask-for-info/prioritize | `references/decision-framework.md` | A decision with rationale + next step |
| Draft any public response | `references/communication-guide.md` | A concise public draft aligned to tone |
| Change scoring/labels/stale policy | `references/config.md` | Proposed config edits + impact |
| Initialize/reshape `.github/maintainer/` state | `references/repo-state-template.md` | Correct state files created/updated |
---
## Gates (Read‑Before‑Acting)
These are “STOP gates” where skipping the right reference tends to cause mistakes.
1. **Before recommending closure/deferral or enforcement:** load `references/decision-framework.md`.
2. **Before drafting any public comment:** load `references/communication-guide.md`.
3. **Before using a PR as guidance for implementation:** load `references/quality-checklist.md`.
4. **Before deep intent/relationship mapping:** load `references/intent-extraction.md`.
5. **Before changing scoring/automation:** load `references/config.md`.
---
## Default Workflow (End‑to‑End)
### Stage 0 — Setup
- Confirm repo and scope.
- Ensure `.github/maintainer/` exists (create via templates if missing).
- Read `.github/maintainer/context.md` to align with project priorities and tone.
### Stage 1 — Capture (Run Triage)
From repo root:
```bash
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts
```
Prefer `--delta` if a previous run exists.
### Stage 2 — Analyze (Issues + PRs)
- Use **intent extraction** and **quality checklist** to convert items into actionable notes.
- Update persistent notes in `.github/maintainer/notes/` (scores, confidence, rationale).
### Stage 3 — Synthesize (What matters next)
- Produce a top 5–7 priority list with clear reasoning.
- Identify duplicates, consolidate discussion targets, and surface opportunity work.
### Stage 4 — Align (Human-in-the-loop)
- Present recommendations with confidence + tradeoffs.
- Ask only for approvals/choices that unblock execution.
### Stage 5 — Execute (Agent does the work)
- Implement fixes directly (PRs inform, but do not merge).
- Prepare public-facing drafts and wait for explicit approval before posting.
### Stage 6 — Record (Project memory)
- Update `.github/maintainer/decisions.md`, `.github/maintainer/patterns.md`, `.github/maintainer/contributors.md`.
- Keep `.github/maintainer/state.json` current for delta runs.
---
## Script Usage
```bash
# Standard run (creates reports/<datetime>/)
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts
# Compare with previous run
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts --delta
# Keep existing folder if same datetime
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts --keep
# Override report folder name
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts --datetime 2026-01-17T12-30-00
# Use a custom config path
npx tsx /path/to/open-source-maintainer/scripts/triage.ts --config .github/maintainer/config.json
```
---
## Per‑Repo State (Persistent Memory)
The skill maintains project memory in `.github/maintainer/`:
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `context.md` | Project vision, priorities, tone, boundaries |
| `decisions.md` | Decision log with reasoning |
| `contributors.md` | Notes on specific contributors |
| `patterns.md` | Observed patterns and learnings |
| `standing-rules.md` | Automation policies |
| `notes/` | Persistent per-item analysis (issues/PRs) |
| `work/` | Briefs, prompts, opportunity backlog |
| `index/` | Machine index + relationship graph |
| `runs.md` | Run ledger with report paths |
| `state.json` | Technical state for delta computation |
Notes/work/index are persistent across runs; reports are snapshots.
---
## Citation Format
Reference items consistently in reports and responses:
- `ISSUE:42` — Issue #42
- `ISSUE:42:C:3` — Comment #3 on issue #42
- `PR:38` — Pull request #38
- `PR:38:R:1` — Review #1 on PR #38
- `PR:38:RC:4` — Review comment #4 on PR #38
---
## Human Approval Required
Never execute without explicit approval:
- Posting comments
- Opening or closing issues or PRs
- Adding/removing labels
- Any public-facing action