jiang-irac-opposition✓ تایید شده

محتوای SKILL.md

---
name: jiang-irac-opposition
description: 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）：基于法条要件、证据链与风险分级的专业级审查与攻防系统。
homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-irac-opposition
metadata:
  clawdbot:
    emoji: "⚖️"
    tags:
      - trademark
      - opposition
      - invalidation
      - cnipa
      - sj-irac
      - evidence
      - legal-ai
---
# 商标异议·无效申请推理引擎（SJ-IRAC）

Author: Jiang Zhongling (商标蒋道理)  
Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd.  
Version: 1.1.2 
Last Updated: 2026-02-03  

---

## Summary (for ClawHub)

A law-firm-grade CNIPA **Opposition / Invalidation** engine that turns case materials into **examiner-readable attack briefs** with **IRAC**, **SJ-6 evidence chains**, and **A–E risk gates**.  
No templates. No fluff. No fabricated facts.

---

## What This Skill Does

This skill ingests **CNIPA registry data + case facts + evidence inventory** and outputs:

- **Ground selection system** (main + auxiliary, prioritized)
- **Element-by-element legal reasoning** (Article-precise, guideline-aligned)
- **SJ-6 evidence chain map** (proof purpose + timeline + weak-link detection)
- **Stop-loss decisions** (standing / time-bar / admissibility / EV-cost kill gates)
- **Submission-ready structure** (Document Mode)

**Constraint:** No generic AI writing. No speculative conclusions. Only verifiable, evidence-backed reasoning.

---

## v1.1 Highlights (Operational Upgrades)

1) **Standing & Limitation Control (Hard Gate)**  
- Eligibility screening before any drafting  
- Time-bar traps surfaced early (relative grounds / 5-year logic where applicable)  
- “不能打”的案子直接止损，不堆字

2) **Procedural Control Review**  
- Deadline control and procedural admissibility checks  
- Suspension triggers / coordination with parallel proceedings  
- Evidence form compliance checks (source, integrity, probative chain)

3) **Risk Engine Refinement (Kill Gates)**  
- Procedural / discretionary fatal-defect gates  
- EV-cost stop-loss when expected value < cost  
- Evidence weakness quantified and action-ranked

---

## Scope & Positioning

### Primary Scope
- CNIPA **Opposition**
- CNIPA **Invalidation** (absolute grounds; relative grounds where legally available)

### Core Mission
Convert dispute materials into a **decision-grade argument system**:
- **Which grounds** to use (and in what order)  
- **Which elements** must be proven  
- **Which evidence** carries probative weight  
- **Which defects** are fatal (stop-loss)  
- **How to write** in a CNIPA examiner-readable structure

### Not a Template Pack
This is an **argument + evidence engineering engine**, not a folder of sample briefs.

---

## Legal Basis (Bounded Sources)

Operates strictly within:

- PRC Trademark Law (2019 Amendment)  
- Implementing Regulations  
- CNIPA Examination & Adjudication Guidelines / review norms  
- Nice Classification + Similar Goods/Services Classification (use your latest internal table)

**Prohibited**
- Fictional statutes, fictional cases, invented timelines  
- “Common sense” replacing evidence  
- Fame/renown claims without third-party proof

---

## Core Framework

### 1) IRAC (Mandatory, Examiner-Oriented)

1. **Issue**: define disputes (grounds, parties, marks, timeframe, target goods/services)  
2. **Rule**: map statutes + guideline purpose + elements + burden/standard  
3. **Application**: match evidence to elements (逐要件对应，不做假设)  
4. **Conclusion**: enforceable outcome + next-step plan (补证/改路/止损)

### 2) SJ-6 Evidence Chain (Mandatory)

Each item is scored under:

1. Authenticity  
2. Relevance  
3. Completeness  
4. Temporal validity  
5. Logical consistency  
6. Cross-examination resistance  

**Evidence organization rules**
- Timeline-first  
- Each exhibit must have an explicit **proof purpose**  
- Identify the **weakest link** and the minimum supplementation set

### 3) Risk Module (A–E + Kill Gates)

Outputs include:

- **Risk Level:** A / B / C / D / E  
- **Risk Dimensions:** Substantive / Evidentiary / Procedural / Discretionary / EV-cost  
- **Kill Gates:** standing缺失、时效障碍、证据不可核验、路径不适配、成本倒挂等

---

## Supported Scenarios

- Opposition: absolute / relative grounds (route-prioritized)  
- Invalidation: absolute grounds; relative grounds within applicable time limits  
- Bad-faith pattern attack: serial filings / hoarding / imitation patterns  
- Cross-class confusion reasoning: confusion → similarity inference where supported  
- Evidence gap diagnosis: replace low-value evidence; build high-signal chain  
- Overloading control: avoid “全都写上”造成裁量反噬

---

## Input Requirements (Minimum Viable Case Packet)

Provide at least:

1. Target trademark number(s), status, filing/registration dates  
2. Parties and relationship clues (if any)  
3. Designated goods/services + class(es)  
4. Case timeline (publication/registration + prior use milestones)  
5. Intended grounds (optional; engine can propose)  
6. Evidence inventory: **source / date / type / brief / proof purpose (if known)**

**If inputs are incomplete → conservative output by design.**

---

## Output Modes

### Quick Mode (Fast Triage)
- rule positioning  
- route shortlist (main/aux)  
- key evidence checklist  
- go/no-go (no full IRAC)

### Pro Mode (IRAC + SJ-6 + Risk)
- full IRAC  
- evidence chain diagnosis + weak-link list  
- A–E risk rating + kill-gate triggers  
- conservative success probability range  
- action plan + supplementation list (ranked by ROI)

### Document Mode (Submission-Ready)
- neutral official tone  
- statute + evidence driven  
- no probabilistic language  
- paragraphing optimized for CNIPA examiner reading  
- exhibits indexed + proof-purpose mapping + timeline tables (if provided)

---

## Compliance & Hard Constraints

- No fabricated facts, transactions, screenshots, or dates  
- No speculation without evidentiary support  
- No inflated influence/fame claims without third-party proof  
- Always surface: **weakest link + minimum fix**  
- If expected value < cost → advise against proceeding + alternatives

---

## Typical Use Cases (Law-Firm Grade)

- CNIPA opposition brief drafting (attack route selection + structure)  
- CNIPA invalidation petition drafting (absolute/relative route control)  
- Bad-faith chain construction (pattern proof + linkage logic)  
- Evidence packet engineering (what to keep / replace / add)  
- Client-facing risk memo (non-guarantee, cost-aware, decision-grade)

---

## How to Use

1. Provide registry data + facts + evidence inventory  
2. Choose mode: Quick / Pro / Document  
3. Receive:
   - prioritized grounds,
   - element-based reasoning,
   - evidence chain + gaps,
   - risk rating + next actions,
   - (Document Mode) submission-ready structure.

---

## Versioning Notes

- Patch (x.y.z): doc/consistency fixes  
- Minor (x.y.0): new modules / workflow upgrades  
- Major (x.0.0): architecture changes

مجوز

مجوز اعلام‌شده: MIT

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2026 openclaw

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

مشاهدهٔ مجوز در مخزن منبع — نسخهٔ منتشرشده در آن‌جا مرجع است.