code-quality

تایید شده

General Correctness rules, Rust patterns, comments, avoiding over-engineering. When writing code always take these into account

@tursodatabase
MIT۱۴۰۴/۱۱/۳۰
41از ۱۰۰
(0)
۱۶.۸k
۲۸
۳۶

نصب مهارت

مهارت‌ها کدهای شخص ثالث از مخازن عمومی GitHub هستند. SkillHub الگوهای مخرب شناخته‌شده را اسکن می‌کند اما نمی‌تواند امنیت را تضمین کند. قبل از نصب، کد منبع را بررسی کنید.

نصب سراسری (سطح کاربر):

npx skillhub install tursodatabase/turso/code-quality

نصب در پروژه فعلی:

npx skillhub install tursodatabase/turso/code-quality --project

مسیر پیشنهادی: ~/.claude/skills/code-quality/

بررسی هوش مصنوعی

کیفیت دستورالعمل50
دقت توضیحات30
کاربردی بودن33
صحت فنی60

Scored 41 — concise but very thin (2KB). Good Rust philosophy (crash > corrupt) but content is largely principles Claude already knows. No trigger phrases in description. Valuable as part of Turso contributing bundle but low standalone value.

محتوای SKILL.md

---
name: code-quality
description: General Correctness rules, Rust patterns, comments, avoiding over-engineering. When writing code always take these into account
---
# Code Quality Guide

## Core Principle

Production database. Correctness paramount. Crash > corrupt.

## Correctness Rules

1. **No workarounds or quick hacks.** Handle all errors, check invariants
2. **Assert often.** Never silently fail or swallow edge cases
3. **Crash on invalid state** if it risks data integrity. Don't continue in undefined state
4. **Consider edge cases.** On long enough timeline, all possible bugs will happen

## Rust Patterns

- Make illegal states unrepresentable
- Exhaustive pattern matching
- Prefer enums over strings/sentinels
- Minimize heap allocations
- Write CPU-friendly code (microsecond = long time)

## If-Statements

Wrong:
```rust
if condition {
    // happy path
} else {
    // "shouldn't happen" - silently ignored
}
```

Right:
```rust
// If only one branch should ever be hit:
assert!(condition, "invariant violated: ...");
// OR
return Err(LimboError::InternalError("unexpected state".into()));
// OR
unreachable!("impossible state: ...");
```

Use if-statements only when both branches are expected paths.

## Comments

**Do:**
- Document WHY, not what
- Document functions, structs, enums, variants
- Focus on why something is necessary

**Don't:**
- Comments that repeat code
- References to AI conversations ("This test should trigger the bug")
- Temporal markers ("added", "existing code", "Phase 1")

## Avoid Over-Engineering

- Only changes directly requested or clearly necessary
- Don't add features beyond what's asked
- Don't add docstrings/comments to unchanged code
- Don't add error handling for impossible scenarios
- Don't create abstractions for one-time operations
- Three similar lines > premature abstraction

## Ensure understanding of IO model

- [Async IO model](../async-io-model/SKILL.md)

## Cleanup

- Delete unused code completely
- No backwards-compat hacks (renamed `_vars`, re-exports, `// removed` comments)