talk-stage4-position⚠ Warning

SKILL.md Content

---
name: talk-stage4-position
description: "Generates 3-4 strategic talk angles with strength/weakness analysis, title options, CFP descriptions, and a peer feedback draft, then enforces a mandatory CHECKPOINT for user confirmation before scripting. Use when deciding how to frame a talk, preparing a CFP submission, or choosing between multiple narrative angles."
allowed-tools: Write Read AskUserQuestion
effort: high
---

# Talk Stage 4: Position + CHECKPOINT

Generates strategic angles, titles, descriptions, and a peer-feedback draft. Then **stops and waits** for your angle + title choice before Stage 5 can proceed.

## When to Use This Skill

- After Stage 3 (Concepts), which provides the concept catalogue
- When deciding how to frame the talk
- Before sending the CFP (uses the generated descriptions directly)

## What This Skill Does

1. **Reads inputs**: summary + concepts + event constraints
2. **Generates angles**: 3-4 distinct angles with strength/weakness analysis
3. **Recommends**: one clear choice with structured justification
4. **Generates titles**: 3-5 options per angle
5. **Generates descriptions**: short abstract + long CFP description
6. **Generates feedback draft**: ready-to-send message (3 formats)
7. **CHECKPOINT**: displays choice request and waits for user response
8. **Saves 4 files**

## Input

- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md` (required)
- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-concepts.md` (required)
- Event constraints: duration, audience, CFP format if applicable

## Output

- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md`
- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md`
- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md`
- `talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md`

## angles.md Format

```markdown
# Talk Angles: {provisional title}

**Goal**: Choose the angle that maximizes impact for {audience}.
**Audience**: {audience description}

---

## Angle 1: {Angle name}

**Pitch**: {2-3 sentences describing the talk from this angle}

**Strengths**:
- {strength 1}
- {strength 2}

**Weaknesses**:
- {weakness 1}
- {weakness 2}

**Audience fit**: Strong / Medium / Weak ({short justification})

**Verdict**: (out of 5 stars)

---

[Angle 2, Angle 3, (optional Angle 4): same structure]

---

## Recommendation: Angle {X}, enriched by the others

**Angle {X} is the right choice.** Here's why:

### 1. It's the only angle that integrates the others
[Structure showing how other angles feed into the main one]

### 2. The narrative arc is natural and compelling
[Why the story holds better with this angle]

### 3. The metrics lend credibility throughout
[Which metrics support this angle most]

### 4. The final message emerges naturally
[How the conclusion flows from this angle]

---

## Recommended structure with sub-angles

| Act | Duration | Main angle | Integrated sub-angle |
|-----|----------|-----------|---------------------|
| 1. {name} | {n} min | {main angle} | {sub-angle} |
...
```

## titre.md Format

```markdown
# Titles: Talk {slug}

**Selected angle**: Angle {X} ({name})
**Constraints**: {duration} min | {audience}

---

## Titles for the recommended angle

### Option 1 (recommended)
**{Main title}**
*Optional subtitle: {subtitle}*

Strengths: {why this title works}
Audience appeal: {who it hooks}

### Option 2
**{Title}**
Strengths: {strengths}

[Options 3-5]

---

## Titles for alternative angles (backup)

### If Angle 2 chosen
- **{title}**
- **{title}**

[If Angle 3 chosen: same structure]

---

## Verdict

**Recommendation**: Option 1 ("{title}")
**Why**: {short justification}
```

## descriptions.md Format

```markdown
# Descriptions: Talk {slug}

---

## Short description (abstract, ~100 words)

{Full text: direct, engaging, starts with the impact or concrete promise.
Not "In this talk, we will..."}

---

## Long description (CFP, ~250 words)

{Full text: context, what the audience will learn, who it's for.
Includes key metrics if available.
Direct and factual tone.}

---

## Speaker pitch (bio-ready, ~50 words)

{Speaker introduction in 1-2 sentences, their relationship to the topic}

---

## Tags / Keywords

{5-10 relevant tags for CFP or search}
```

## CHECKPOINT (mandatory, Step 7)

After generating and saving the 4 files, display:

```
---
CHECKPOINT: Angle + Title choice

I've generated 4 files:
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md    -> {n} angles analyzed
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md     -> {n} title options
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md

Before starting the script (Stage 5), I need your choice:

1. Which angle do you choose? (recommended: Angle {X}, {name})
2. Which title do you prefer? (recommended: "{title}")

You can also modify, combine, or propose something different.
Reply to start the script.
---
```

**Do not invoke Stage 5 without explicit user confirmation.**

## Angle Generation Rules

- Minimum 3 angles, maximum 4 (beyond that it's noise)
- Each angle must be genuinely distinct (not variations of the same)
- The recommendation must be clear and argued, not "your choice"
- Always test: "can this angle sustain the full duration without repeating?"

## Anti-patterns

- Click-bait titles ("What nobody tells you about AI")
- Recommending the last angle listed by default (recency bias)
- Descriptions that read like slide summaries
- Skipping the CHECKPOINT (it's the pipeline's most important control point)
- Marketing language in descriptions (revolutionary, etc.)

## Validation Checklist

- [ ] 3-4 angles with strength/weakness/audience-fit analysis
- [ ] Clear recommendation with structured justification
- [ ] 3-5 titles for the recommended angle
- [ ] Short description (~100 words) and long description (~250 words)
- [ ] Feedback draft generated from template
- [ ] CHECKPOINT displayed clearly
- [ ] 4 files saved

## Tips

- Send `feedback-draft.md` to a peer before the checkpoint; 10 minutes of external feedback can save hours of rework on the script
- The recommendation is a starting point, not an order (your audience knowledge overrides any algorithmic suggestion)
- Weak titles are usually too abstract: test each title by asking "would someone in the hallway stop walking to read this?"

## Templates

- Peer feedback formats: [`templates/feedback-draft.md`](templates/feedback-draft.md)

## Related

- [Stage 3: Concepts](../stage-3-concepts/SKILL.md): prerequisite
- [Stage 5: Script](../stage-5-script/SKILL.md): starts after this CHECKPOINT
- [Orchestrator](../orchestrator/SKILL.md)

License

Declared license: MIT

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2026 FlorianBruniaux

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

View the license in the source repository — the version published there is authoritative.